Fast Food Tier List
Twelve chains, judged on four things that rarely agree: taste, price, consistency and convenience. A chain can win on one and lose badly on another, which is exactly why this board needs a named criterion rather than a general verdict. All twelve entries begin in Unranked, so the ordering is entirely yours: drag or tap into S–F, rename the rows, share the link or export a PNG.
McDonald’s
Burger King
Wendy’s
KFC
Popeyes
Taco Bell
Subway
Chipotle
Five Guys
In-N-Out
Chick-fil-A
Shake Shack0 of 12 items ranked.
Board saved automatically in this browser. Original.
How this board is built: the 12 tiles are an editorial starting set, not an official roster and not a published ranking — every entry waits in Unranked until you place it. Item tiles are original pictograms or two-letter emblems drawn for this site rather than character artwork, film stills or club logos, so nothing here is licensed material reused from a rights holder. Tiers you set are your own judgement.
What's included in this Fast Food board
The board arrives with all 12 entries present as tiles and none of them assigned to a tier. That is deliberate: a template that opens with a finished ranking only invites you to agree or disagree with whoever made it, whereas an empty ladder makes you commit to an ordering of your own. Drag a tile onto a row, or on a phone tap the tile and then the tier you want. You can add rows for extra categories, rename the standard ones, and remove any entry you do not recognise — a list you can defend is more useful than a long one you cannot.
How to rank this Fast Food board
Rank taste first, and be specific about which item you have in mind — most chains have one thing worth ordering and several that are not. Price is a separate axis: value is taste divided by cost, and a cheap item that you would not finish is not good value. Consistency is the third pass and the most underrated; a chain that is reliably fine beats one that is occasionally excellent and otherwise disappointing, especially when you are ordering for other people. Convenience closes the board: hours, locations and how the food travels. If you are ranking globally, note the country, because menus and quality vary substantially between markets.
Using the board without over-thinking it
Most people finish a board like this in a couple of minutes and then reorder the middle rows for another ten. That middle is where the honest disagreement lives, so do not rush it: place the obvious top three and the obvious bottom three first, then work inward. If two entries still feel identical, that is a real observation — say so in a row note or a text tile rather than inventing a difference. When the ordering settles, export the PNG so the arrangement is saved somewhere permanent, and copy the share link if you want someone else to argue with it.
Ranking criteria used here
- taste
- price
- consistency
- convenience
Before you share it
Put your criterion in the board title, so a reader knows whether they are looking at a favourites list or an analytical one. If the subject changes with patches, seasons or releases, add the date. And remember the share link carries tier names, colours and the tile order — uploaded photos stay on your device, so export a PNG when those matter.
All 12 items in this template
Back to the boardMcDonald’sBurger KingWendy’sKFCPopeyesTaco BellSubwayChipotleFive GuysIn-N-OutChick-fil-AShake ShackFast Food tier list FAQ
Should I rank chains by their best item or the whole menu?
Best item flatters a chain with one hit; whole menu is harsher and more useful. Pick one and say it, because the two orderings are very different.
Does price belong in this list?
Only as a named criterion. Mixing price into a taste ranking produces odd results, such as a mediocre but cheap item outranking something you would actually choose.
